All times are UTC




Post new topic This topic is locked, you cannot edit posts or make further replies.  [ 23 posts ]  Digg: Armor Break penetrating half of MR  Digg: Armor Break penetrating half of MR  Digg: Armor Break penetrating half of MR  Digg: Armor Break penetrating half of MR Go to page Previous  1, 2, 3
  Print view

Should Armor Break penetrate half of target's MR?
Yes 42%  42%  [ 10 ]
Penetrate less 8%  8%  [ 2 ]
Penetrate more 4%  4%  [ 1 ]
No 46%  46%  [ 11 ]
Total votes : 24

Re: Armor Break penetrating half of MR
Author Message
PostPosted: Mon Jun 25, 2012 7:13 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Mon Apr 30, 2012 8:43 pm
Posts: 504
SlowHit wrote:
Guardian wrote:
^^yup plus DO NOT MAKE ANYTHING SAFE TO +3 ONLY +1 SHOULD BE SAFE!

this will crack down even more on the manu armour or even only add gems to normal armour as in u cant add gems to knight manu


The whole point of gems, is to make manu armor good.


they were atualy put in so players so slowly collect materials to build a set rather then hope they get lucky drops,

_________________
Image


Top
 Profile  
 

Re: Armor Break penetrating half of MR
PostPosted: Wed Jun 27, 2012 5:28 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Mon Jun 25, 2012 11:52 pm
Posts: 313
I voted No for the simple fact that I don't even know what the situation is anymore. There's other things being done but we don't know what they are yet. Update the OP with whatever Manu socket changes, gems changes, mr changes, MA neck changes, MA in general, stat caps, global character stat caps, and any other possible changes there are before asking to fundamentally change a strong spell to even more powerful when it may not be needed.

And No, this is not coming from a warrior experience, I played mage.

More information pls

_________________
Cleroth wrote:
Every change is documented in the version history.
campe wrote:
Cleroth, your players need you, you'r experience and skills exceeds completely our comprehension
Image


Top
 Profile  
 

Re: Armor Break penetrating half of MR
PostPosted: Wed Jun 27, 2012 6:40 am 
Offline
Site Admin
User avatar

Joined: Mon Apr 30, 2012 2:42 am
Posts: 2844
Richtofen wrote:
I voted No for the simple fact that I don't even know what the situation is anymore. There's other things being done but we don't know what they are yet. Update the OP with whatever Manu socket changes, gems changes, mr changes, MA neck changes, MA in general, stat caps, global character stat caps, and any other possible changes there are before asking to fundamentally change a strong spell to even more powerful when it may not be needed.

And No, this is not coming from a warrior experience, I played mage.

More information pls

Indeed. So far we've been gathering ideas and propositions from everyone. I'll make a summary of what we've come up with tomorrow and post it on announcements.
I'll close this topic for now, as I don't think this needs changing at this stage.


Top
 Profile  
 

Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic This topic is locked, you cannot edit posts or make further replies.  [ 23 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2, 3

All times are UTC


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 2 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  




All times are UTC - It is currently Wed May 24, 2017 6:02 am

Liquid Black Designed By Andrew / Powered by phpBB © 2008 phpBB Group